Garrett D'Amore wrote:
Given that part of the point of the putback for e1000g was to open
source it, I would have expected the reviewers to carefully checked for
coverage before it was released. (Both technical and legal reviewers.)
The engineers responsible did not get the right set of reviewers.
Webrev unfortunately did not show the simple rename, so the RTI advocate
was unable to see the wrongly-renamed file.
but yes, there are procedural changes that need to be made.
cheers,
steve
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 650.786.0845 | http://whacked.net
opensolaris // solaris kernel development
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-code mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
