On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 08:34:08PM +0100, Roland Mainz wrote: > What about "contracts" between individual projects, e.g. dtksh vs. ksh93 > in OS/Net or dbx vs. ksh93 in OS/Net ? Would that be a justification to > ship the lint libraries (I guess the answer is "no") ? > > Alternatively we could create something like a > "SUNWastprivateplayground" (e.g. "AST private API playground") package > which provides the private API add-ones as a seperate package stored at > the project website... > ... would it be allowed to have the package build pieces for such a > thing in usr/src/pgkdefs/ (e.g. we built the package but do not ship it > with Solaris nor ARC it (for now)) ?
Sure. We've got about a dozen packages like that right now. At least one of them (SUNWwbint) is used as part of the admin gate's CBE. But I thought that's what SUNWastdev was all about. Danek _______________________________________________ opensolaris-code mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
