Mike Kupfer wrote:
> 
> >>>>> "Roland" == Roland Mainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[snip]
> That said, I can see how keeping all the upstream files, using the
> upstream source layout, would simplify future updates.
> 
> I think the current items in the exception list (Perl, GRUB, tcpd, etc)
> are sufficient precedent to keep the ksh93 files.  We might decide that
> we don't like that precedent and that we need to rethink the way we
> handle components with upstream updates, but let's not force the ksh93
> team to wait until we've done that work.
> 
> I still would really like to see a README or something to indicate that
> the <library>/common/Makefile files are unused.

Ok...

... David (Comay): Are there any objections to leave the all the files
in place and add a README for now describing the source file layout ?

----

Bye,
Roland

-- 
  __ .  . __
 (o.\ \/ /.o) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  \__\/\/__/  MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer
  /O /==\ O\  TEL +49 641 7950090
 (;O/ \/ \O;)
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-code mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code

Reply via email to