BusyBox incorporated the debian ash shell 0.3.8-5 with release 0.52 (07/2001) for the standalone shell option. I do not know what the built-in shell is based off, but I do know it is not POSIX compliant.
On 08/03/07, Bruno Jargot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Huh? I think its a stripped down bash. The shell in BusyBox has all the bash features, including high memory consumption. Bruno On 3/7/07, Garrett D'Amore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bruno Jargot wrote: > > How does BusyBox helps you to reduce the size of the current > > footprint? Its an All-in-One solution where lots of code gets shared > > between commands. And a ksh93-based BusyBox requires even less > > footprint because ksh93 uses less memory than bash. > > Huh. BusyBox is orthogonal to bash. It doesn't use bash at all, IIRC, > but "ash" or some other "limited" shell. _______________________________________________ opensolaris-code mailing list opensolaris-code@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
-- "Less is only more where more is no good." --Frank Lloyd Wright Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ opensolaris-code mailing list opensolaris-code@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
