John Plocher wrote:
Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 04:03:19AM +0100, Roland Mainz wrote:
Grumpf...
Am I correct in thinking that your concerns around removing these
files are entirely a result of a belief that the structure of the code
should be optimised for bulk upgrades from an external source base?
It sounds like there is/will/reallyshouldbe two different blobs of
code in the source tree:
The baseline ATT sources, exactly as delivered by ATT
and
A derived set of OpenSolaris source files
That sounds exactly like the SFW model and completely not like the ON
model. Given this project is targeting ON (for what ever reason -
personally I think it might have been more appropriate for SFW but I
don't know enough of the details so I trust the project teams choice of
using ON) that is NOT appropriate.
--
Darren J Moffat
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-code mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
