Richard Lowe wrote: > James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Mark J. Nelson writes: >>> I think an upstream sync necessarily implies pulling the current upstream >>> source, integrating your changes, and building it OUTSIDE of the context >>> of ON. Anything else is negligent. Including the unused-in-ON code >>> provides no benefits that are immediately obvious to me. >> +1. >> >> It creates an ever-increasing amount of flotsam in the gate, and thus >> a storage and time penalty that every single ON-based workspace must >> pay. It's waste with benefit to few -- and likely nobody at all. >> > > And it would make tag searches, cscope, opengrok, etc, needlessly noisy, if > these are actual source files. That alone is bad enough, in my view.
OTOH, it means you're more likely to understand other-platform effects of any changes you may be contemplating by looking at an ON workspace... _______________________________________________ opensolaris-code mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
