On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 8:31 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Way overboard", I'd say.
Sorry, I should have been clearer. > Or is there really much interest in all other output flavors? I was only listing it as a point of comparison to show how another variant of ps handled syntax compatibility. Believe me when I say I was not suggesting that you or anyone else implement all the bizarre ps syntax that GNU ps supports! :) > The only other option I'm missing is the ability to specify a width for > all columns. I think what you're doing is fine, I just wanted to reference how another variant of ps handles syntax. Cheers, -- Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/ "To err is human -- and to blame it on a computer is even more so." - Robert Orben _______________________________________________ opensolaris-code mailing list opensolaris-code@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
