Garrett D'Amore wrote: >The IOCPARM_MASK removal was covered by PSARC case 2008/343. I'm >thinking that MAXIOCBSZ is not a documented API, isn't used *anywhere* >outside of the files I'm removing it from here (according to Google at >least) -- apart from automatically generated Perl and Python files >(generated from the header files), so I think I can probably get away >without an ARC case for it. If anyone else on the recipient list feels >different, let me know -- I can file an auto-approval case pretty >trivially. (Mostly I didn't file the case just to avoid the 1 week >timeout that such normally incurs, particularly since this seems pretty >obvious at this point.) > >
I think a fast track would be worthwhile, especially since you're increasing the structure size allowed for ioctls which really does mean that you're changing an interface. Auto-approved seems to be appropriate? Darren _______________________________________________ opensolaris-code mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
