Peter Memishian wrote:
> [ This is unrelated to the original topic; changing subject. It'd be nice
> if we could stay on-point. ]
>
> > > > 2) I did find *one* potential issue in ON, which is that struct
> > > > iftun_req has a size of 600. All other ioctls defined in ON header
> > > > files use sizes that won't be truncated. The ioctls impacted are
> > > > SIOCGTUNPARAM and SIOCSTUNPARAM.
> > >
> > > FWLIW, those ioctls are gone in the Clearview gate and will be gone from
> > > ON when Clearview IP Tunneling integrates.
> >
> > OK, so let me ask a dumb question. If the ioctls are gone, are they
> > used by any code outside of ON? They are certainly documented in
> > tun(7M), but I'm inclined to believe that nothing uses them.
>
> Right, nothing uses them that we're aware of.
>
> > One of my biggest concerns, though, is punchin. I don't know if punchin
> > makes use of them at all. (Dan McDonald: can you comment?)
>
> Dan McDonald has been an honorary member of our team on the tunneling
> work and is well aware of the changes.
>
>
Yay. I'm very happy about this.
I'll send out a flag day notice, but at the moment, I'm inclined to take
no action at all.
-- Garrett
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-code mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
