Gavin Maltby wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm guessing that missing snmp packages explain the failure
> to build the fmd snmp module.
>
> Not sure they'd explain the failure on hypersubr.o
There was this bug:
6769256 snv_102 /usr/bin/as is toxic to ON
which includes this:
/usr/ccs/bin/as -P -DXPV_HVM_DRIVER -D_KERNEL -D_SYSCALL32
-D_DDI_STRICT -Di86pc -D_MACHD
EP -DOPTERON_ERRATUM_88 -DOPTERON_ERRATUM_91 -DOPTERON_ERRATUM_93
-DOPTERON_ERRATUM_95 -DO
PTERON_ERRATUM_99 -DOPTERON_ERRATUM_100 -DOPTERON_ERRATUM_101
-DOPTERON_ERRATUM_108 -DOPTE
RON_ERRATUM_109 -DOPTERON_ERRATUM_121 -DOPTERON_ERRATUM_122
-DOPTERON_ERRATUM_123 -DOPTERO
N_ERRATUM_131 -DOPTERON_WORKAROUND_6336786 -DOPTERON_WORKAROUND_6323525
-DOPTERON_ERRATUM_172 -DOPTERON_ERRATUM_298 -D_ASM -D__STDC__=0
-I../../../common/xen -I../../../i86pc/
i86hvm -I../../../i86pc -I/builds/acruz/onnv/usr/src/common
-I../../../intel -I../../../co
mmon -I../../../i86pc/genassym/obj32 -o obj32/hypersubr.o
../../../intel/ia32/ml/hypersub
r.s
Assembler:
"../../../intel/ia32/ml/hypersubr.s", line 153 : Internal:
get_execsect_fillword:
nbytes too big
so that could be the hypersubr issue. I think that was undone in 103
and an updated as with a fix delivered in 106. So you'd have to
be on 102 to see it (the nightly mail_msg should tell you).
Mike
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-code mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
