Wealth of U.S.A. Plundered by Jews
Thursday, 05 February 2009
By Texe Marrs
It's all over the media, how one Wall Street crook, Bernie Madoff, masterminded
the greatest Ponzi scheme in history. Bernie ripped off investors to the tune
of $50 billion, and they're still counting.
Fifty billion! That's more than the current market value of General Motors,
Disney, Boeing, and Anheuser-Busch combined. And just one solitary individuala
corrupt, money-grabbing Jew named "Madoff"is the culprit.
But, wait...hold on. Is this one crime the whole picture, the full extent of
Wall Street's monumental scam and robbery extravaganza? Not by a long shot!
Yes Virginia, There is a Santa Claus
Citibank's Jewish money-shovelers stole some $200 billionand then got the
idiots at the U.S. Treasury to dole out some $160 billion of ourthe suffering
taxpayershard-earned money into their coffers. Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa
Claus and his name is "Uncle Sam."
America's banking industry is exclusively Jewish-run. The same goes for Wall
Street brokerage and investment houses. Investigate for yourself and you'll
discover that the New York-Chicago money crowd is nearly 100 percent Jews.
They're the onesthese bamboozling and crafty, satanic Jewswho greedily have
broken the
backs of millions of bedraggled and unsuspecting American workers through their
unparalleled lust for filthy lucre.
Jesus told us this would be the case. He warned us in advance. He gave the Jews
a choice: God or Mammon. They chose Mammon (i.e., money) and then added icing
to their cake on earth by torturing, mocking, then finally nailing our Lord and
Savior to a wooden cross. Oh, excuse me. The Jews didn't do it themselves. They
never do. They got the Romans to do their dirty work. Pilate at first refused,
until the Jews made it clear to the Roman Governor he better do their bidding,
or else. Like today's miserly and cowardly politicians, Pilate caved in.
Crucified on a Cross of Gold
Now, it's America's turn to be crucified, on a cross of Jewish-owned gold. The
Jews of Wall Street are the perps of this crucifixion. They run Wall Street,
have their grimy hands all over our U.S. Treasury, force Congress to bow down
and worship their murderous idol, "Israel," and then lie and cast blame
elsewhere.
Now Bernie Madoff, former chairman of the NASDAQ Stock Exchange, is only one of
thousands of money manipulating Jewish thugs running loose in these 50
statesand they all have Gentile lackeys kissing their feet and mopping floors
for themmen like George W. ("McMoron") Bush, Bill ("Bimbo") Clinton, and Vice
President
Joe ("Big Mouth Clown") Biden, just to name a few. But consider the damage that
this one scheming Jew, Madoff, did and multiply that times, say, 100,000.
Writing in the Business section of the Austin American-Statesman (December 28,
2008), news reporter Scott Burns commented on the Madoff robbery:
"The loss is mind-boggling...One way to measure the extent of the damage is to
compare the $50 billion to measures of loss in the FBI Uniform Crime Reports.
In 2007 there were 9.8 million crimes against property in the United States.
This included about 2.2 million burglaries, 6.6 million thefts, and 1.1 million
car thefts.
I think you'll agree that 9.8 million crimes represent a veritable army of
miscreants. In spite of that, our total losses to such property crimes in 2007
throughout the entire United States were a mere $17.6 billion...
But when you add up all the losses in 9.8 million common property crimes, it's
just a fraction of the estimated $50 billion loss attributed to Madoff.
Jews Also Behind the Most Inhumane, Bloody Crime in History
Think of it. One evil Jew, Madoff, made off with a staggering total equal to
somewhere near the losses of about 30 million crimes. There's more, of course.
It's not just the money. The Jews are also behind the most sinister and bloody
inhuman crime ever committed in the annals of human historythe Soviet
Communist Holocaust.
The late Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, the 20th century's most acclaimed literary
figure and historian, reported in his final book, Two Hundred Years Together,
that the Jews were the revolutionary conspirators and mass murderers
responsible for the Communist holocaust in which a mind-warping 66 million
innocent victims were
tortured, imprisoned in filthy, gruesome gulag camps and, finally, unmercifully
executed. Lenin, Trotsky, Kaganovichall these Communist monsters were Jews and
their talmudic goal was a global Communist "Utopia," led, of course,
exclusively by Zionist Jews.
Allegedlyand I use that word advisedlythe Jews accuse Hitler and his Nazis of
the murder of six million in the misnamed German "holocaust." Modern-day
researchers, however, are discovering that this figure, six million, is grossly
exaggerated so that Jews can appear as "victims" and thus continue incessantly
to demand
money and reparations from a clueless and guilt-filled Gentile world.
66 Million Butchered by Jews!
Nevertheless, contrast this six million Jewish dead number to Solzhenitsyn's
very accurate statistic of 66 million slain by the psychopathic Jewish
Communists in the former Soviet Union. Many, if not most, of these victims were
Christians. (Note: Jews were favored in the U.S.S.R. and synagogues were
protected. Anti-Semitic
"crimes"even thought crimeswere met with death sentences by Jewish courts in
the Soviet justice system).
Tally it up: 66 million Christians slaughtered by the Jews, 6 million
(allegedly) by the Nazis. That's eleven dead Christians for each and every Jew.
The world has no sorrow for these 66 million dead, their survivors get no
reparations, and their Jewish tormentorsincluding scores of Jewish Gulag
Commandantstoday remain free.
Some live in luxury in Israel and pleasurably enjoy fat bank accounts, money
plundered from hapless Christian victims.
Barack Obama, America's First Jewish President
The Jews did it to Russia, Ukraine, Georgia, Estonia, Kazakhstan, and all the
other Communist prison nations. Now, in 2009, they're scheduled to do the same
thing to the once, great U.S.A. Barack Obamawhom Chicago's wealthiest Jews
boast is America's "First Jewish President"is their chosen instrument. Wily,
cunning,
handsome, Obama has a cohort Jew to assist him in this assigned mission of
human and national destruction. That would be Rahm "The Cruel" Emanuel, the
Enforcer, the new White House Chief of Staff. Just for writing this article, I
expect to be placed near the top of this wicked man's "Hit List." And I suspect
there will be so
many on this list that the White House and its Homeland Security Department
will need a whole warehouse full of computers just to store all the millions of
names.
FDR had his "New Deal;" today, in 2009, Barack Hussein Obama and his
Trotskyite, left-hand lieutenant, the beady-eyed Israeli dual citizen, "Rahm
the Cruel," have in mind the "Jew Deal." The goal: The Sovietization of
America, the extinguishing of our historic Bill of Rights, the end of U.S.
sovereignty, and the death of
multitudes who will refuse to bow down to the ruthless tyrants who wear the
six-pointed Red Star in their hearts like a dagger.
"If You Can, Come and Take It"
Our enemies, regrettably, occupy the highest offices in the land. But they
don't have everything they desire and lust for. They don't have the fawning
allegiance and docile service of you, me, and thousands of other patriots who
bravely oppose their black-hearted plot.
I am not, by nature, a violent man, and I pray fervently for peace and harmony
to prevail. I pray, too, that the schemes of the Zionist Jews plotting against
America will fail, that our Constitution will be respected and that the corrupt
money-thieves on Wall Street and elsewhere will soon be outed and put in
prisons, where they
belong.
But if not, then I say, let us fight for the right. Here we stand, by virtue of
Truth and Justice, and I say to Obama, Emanuel, and the other Zionist traitors:
"Here we are; if you can, come and take it, but know this: You have a fight on
your hands, because we will not go quietly out into that soft, sweet night. And
believe me, you
can take that, along with your ill-begotten gains, to the bank."
Source : http://ziopedia.org/articles/jewry/wealth_of_u.s.a._plundered_by_jews/
----<>----
The Holocaust is Now Catholic Dogma
Thursday, 05 February 2009
By Mark Glenn
The last time a Pope of the Catholic Church defined an infallible dogma was in
the year 1950. Pope Pius XII used this power reserved for the Vicar of Christ
when speaking ex cathedra to define the Dogma of the Assumption of Mary. It was
an extraordinary event because a pope using the power of infallibly to define a
dogma is
done so rarely, and most popes have never used this power. Before Pius XII, the
last pope to invoke papal infallibly to define a dogma was Pius IX in 1854,
when he defined the Dogma of the Immaculate Conception. Both of these dogmas
referred to events that had occurred 19 centuries before , and that had been
studied by
the best minds of the Church for almost as long. Thats because when making an
infallible statement - it goes without saying - it cant contain any errors!
Fast forward to 2009 and Pope Benedict XVI has just defined a new dogma
regarding a secular event that has nothing to do with the Faith. Moreover, this
dogmatic event
only occurred in the middle of the 20th Century- and no one is allowed to
investigate to see if it contains any errors!
A dogma is an infallible teaching of the Catholic Church that must be believed
by every Catholic or theyre not in communion with the Church. In the past, a
dogma referred only to a matter of Christian faith, and Catholics could believe
whatever they wanted about historical events. But todays remarks from the
Vatican make it
clear that the Jewish version of the Holocaust, in which 6 million Jews were
killed in gas chambers, must be believed by every Catholic or theyre not in
communion with the Church. That makes the Holocaust an official dogma of the
Catholic Faith (*sarcasm*). Heres the news out of the Vatican.
On Jan. 28, the pope said he felt full and indisputable solidarity with Jews,
and warned against any denial of the full horror of the Nazi genocide.
Bishop Williamson, in order to be admitted to episcopal functions within the
church, will have to take his distance, in an absolutely unequivocal and public
fashion, from his position on the Shoah, which the Holy Father was not aware of
when the excommunication was lifted, the statement said. The Shoah is the
Hebrew term for
the Holocaust.
Jewish groups welcomed the Vatican statement, saying it satisfied their key
demand.
This was the sign the Jewish world has been waiting for, said Ronald Lauder,
president of the World Jewish Congress.
Yes, this is the sign the Jewish world has been waiting for, but what exactly
does this sign really mean? It means that in the post-Vatican II Church, the
Shoah has replaced the Crucifixion as the central event in history. And do
you notice the subtle switcheroo here? Now, instead of the central tenet of the
Christian faith
pertaining to the murder of the Christ by Jews, the new central tenet refers to
the murder of Jews by Christians! This should come as no surprise to those who
understand what really lies at the heart of the problem. At its core, this is a
spiritual battle thats being waged above our heads. Its Christ vs.
anti-Christ, and each of us
must choose a side.
Lucifer wanted to be equal to God and out of pride refused to accept being a
servant. When he uttered his famous non servium he took a third of the angels
with him and set about waging war against God. When God sent His Son to redeem
the world, Lucifer tried to prevent it. He took Jesus to the mountain top and
tempted
Him, saying if you just bow down and worship me, I will give you all these
things. Jesus told the devil to buzz off. The Jews who rejected Jesus as the
Messiah did so out of racial pride and ambition. They wanted an earthly kingdom
where they would always be the Chosen Ones and did not want to share a
kingdom with the
gentiles. But Jesus emphatically said that His kingdom was not of this world
and to share the good news with the gentiles. The Jews who accepted the Messiah
became the first Christians, and those who rejected Him fell into spiritual
blindness. Satan takes advantage of Jewish hatred of Jesus and uses them to
battle against
the Church of Christ. The Jews continue to wait for a wordly Messiah, but the
Messiah they await is known to us as the anti-Christ. Therefore, all Christians
must love and pray for the Jewish people to accept Christ as the Messiah,
thereby snatching them from the jaws of Satan, whom they dont realize they are
serving.
This battle between Christ and anti-Christ is 2,000 years old and all popes
throughout history have waged it (at least until 1958). Thats what makes the
Churchs post-Vatican II attitude toward the Jews so perplexing, since it
enables them to continue in spiritual blindness and sets the stage for the
coming of the anti-Christ. Pope
Leo XIII had a vision at the end of the 19th Century in which he forsaw that
the devil had been given extra powers for 100 years to try to destroy the
Church. This seems to coincide with the shift in power that took place in the
20th Century when after two world wars, the Jews took Palestine and solidified
their control over the
West. This was also the century in which the Jews unleashed their most deadly
weapon, Communism, which caused the deaths of millions of people. But these
peoples genocides go unnoticed and certainly have not been declared dogma by
a pope of the Catholic Church. Another clue that something is amiss inside the
Church is that the Second Vatican Council refused to condemn Communism, but
declared that anti-Semitism was a sin (without defining what constitutes
anti-Semitism).
Enter Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX), and the man
whos currently being crucified, Bishop Richard Williamson. Archbishop Lefebvre
himself had fought inside the Second Vatican Council to prevent the coup of the
liberals. He also stated that the mere fact that the Council refused to condemn
Communism was enough to call the Council into question. The Archbishop knew
that something nefarious had happened inside the Church and sensed that he was
waging a battle against powers and principalities. In terms of his plans to
restore Tradition, in the Biography of Marcel Lefebvre by Bishop Tissier de
Mallerais, he
quotes the Archbishop as saying (pp. 500-501):
The Council is a non-infallible act of the Magisterium and, therefore, it is
open to being influenced by a bad spirit
Therefore, we need to apply the
criterion of Tradition to the various Council documents to see what we can
keep, what needs clarifying, and what should be rejected.
And thats exactly the whole point of the negotiations between the SSPX and the
Vatican that have been going on for almost 40 years. After the release of the
Latin Mass and the lifting of the excommunications, the next phase is doctrinal
discussions. But somebody doesnt want that to happen. Archbishop Lefebvre
founded
the SSPX in 1970 in order to train priests in Tradition and not in the
confusing, untraditional, Judeo-Masonic manner of the post-Conciliar era. The
greatest threat to Revolutionaries is those who are not afraid to resist them
to the face, i.e., the Counter-Revolutionaries. That is why Pope John Paul II
would not allow Archbishop
Lefebvre to consecrecate bishops, something that is usually rubber-stamped for
every other order. John Paul II wanted the SSPX to go extinct after the death
of its founder and put a stop to the Counter-Revolution. And if the Council
really was influenced by a bad spirit as the Archbishop said, then certainly
any attempt to
exorcise this bad spirit would be met with the fiercest resistance by those who
work for the anti-Christ.
This is where the controversy over Bishop Williamsons remarks about the actual
number of Jews killed in the Holocaust comes into the scenario. If the Jews are
(wittingly or unwittingly) working to bring about the reign of the anti-Christ,
then part of their strategy has to be to neutralize the Church. In their effort
to overturn the
crucifixion and replace it with the Shoah, theyre trying to utilize the
Church to bring this about. And any force that appears to provide resistance to
this switcheroo will be seen as the gravest possible threat. Because truly, it
wouldnt have mattered if Bishop Williamson had not said a word about the
Shoah, they would have
found something else to try to impede the Churchs return to Tradition. Because
Christ and anti-Christ cannot co-exist on equal terms - one must naturally
dominate the other. And the Church returning to Tradition and her normal role
as the Church Militant is the one monkey wrench that could be thrown into the
plans of the anti-
Christ. No other challenger intimidates them, absolutely no one else causes
them to tremble. But a fully traditional Church Militant with a billion souls
in her army is the one thing that could defeat their plans. And thats what
this is really all about.
Bishop Williamson now finds himself in the center of a controvery that has been
coming to a head for a very long time. In perusing the Catholic blogosphere, it
appears that most Catholics (even trads) wish that he had just kept his mouth
shut. But they would probably have said the same thing to Jesus, so as not to
annoy the
Pharisees. But Im convinced Our Lord Jesus Christ knows what he is doing.
Because it is time to confront the truth, as the the hour glass of time winds
down, and get ready for the final conflagration. But it appears most Christians
would rather retreat to the hills, rather than risk not being popular with the
world. Thankfully, for the
sake of our salvation, Jesus Himself was not so pusillanimous. And hopefully
Bishop Williamson wont be so pusillanimous either, since his founder,
Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, most assuredly was not. The Archbishop personally
chose Richard Williamson to carry on his work after his death, to be a
successor to the apostles.
The only question that remains is: will he be like St. John or like the others
who abandoned Jesus for fear of the Jews.
The Church and the Jews have been locked in this battle for 2,000 years, so
this latest controversy is nothing to be surprised about. Satan uses the poor,
blinded Jews to attack the Lords Church because he doesnt want us or them to
be saved. But at least in the past, it used to be clear which side the popes
were on! The
Pope and SSPX bishops need all our prayers and support right now, because they
are going through a trial by fire. And, at least in this early stage, it
appears Bishop Fellay is starting to get cold feet. Every day for the past
several days he has issued a denunciation of his colleague, Bishop Williamson,
each one more hysterical
than the last. He even went so far as to refer to the Jews as our elder
brothers in the faith, as though the Talmud has anything to do with our Faith.
When I said last week that I wished Bishop Fellay would one day be pope, I
didnt mean in the mold of John Paul II!
Let us pray especially for Pope Benedict XVI, the keeper of the keys to heaven,
that he prove himself a worthy successor of St. Peter, and that he not imitate
Peter in his denial of Jesus Christ. Archbishop Lefebvre recognized that the
day would come when the SSPX would be called on to save the Church. And judging
by the
howls and screams from the satanic press, that day might be just around the
corner. Let us hope that we also have the courage to stand beside them, no
matter how much the media attack and lambaste us. Its for the Jews own good
after all, for they know not whom they are serving. As the Archbishop wrote in
1966 (ibid, pp.
382-83):
When the Holy Father realizes that those whom he trusted are leading the Church
to her ruin, he will find himself a group of bishops
who are ready to
rebuild. Unfortunately, the time has not yet come, because the Holy Father
himself must change what he is doing, and that conversion will be painful.
Let us hope that the time has come and that Pope Benedict will accept the help
of the SSPX. It is time for the Holy Father to stop taking sides with the
enemies of the Church and stop defining secular events as dogma, especially
ones so riddled through with holes. May God save the Church through His
servant, Pope
Benedict, although the Popes conversion will be painful.
Source :
http://ziopedia.org/articles/holocaust/the_holocaust_is_now_catholic_dogma/
----<>----
Why No Neocon Assassinations? Because The War On Terror Is A Hoax
February 03, 2009
By Paul Craig Roberts
According to US government propaganda, terrorist cells are spread throughout
America, making it necessary for the government to spy on all Americans and
violate most other constitutional protections. Among President Bushs last
words as he left office was the warning that America would soon be struck again
by Muslim
terrorists.
If America were infected with terrorists, we would not need the government to
tell us. We would know it from events. As there are no events, the US
government substitutes warnings in order to keep alive the fear that causes the
public to accept pointless wars, the infringement of civil liberty, national ID
cards, and
inconveniences and harassments when they fly.
The most obvious indication that there are no terrorist cells is that not a
single neocon has been assassinated.
I do not approve of assassinations, and am ashamed of my countrys government
for engaging in political assassination. The US and Israel have set a very bad
example for al Qaeda to follow.
The US deals with al Qaeda and Taliban by assassinating their leaders, and
Israel deals with Hamas by assassinating its leaders. It is reasonable to
assume that al Qaeda would deal with the instigators and leaders of Americas
wars in the Middle East in the same way.
Today every al Qaeda member is aware of the complicity of neoconservatives in
the death and devastation inflicted on Muslims in Iraq, Afghanistan, Lebanon
and Gaza. Moreover, neocons are highly visible and are soft targets compared to
Hamas and Hezbollah leaders. Neocons have been identified in the media for
years,
and as everyone knows, multiple listings of their names are available online.
Neocons do not have Secret Service protection. Dreadful to contemplate, but it
would be childs play for al Qaeda to assassinate any and every neocon. Yet,
neocons move around freely, a good indication that the US does not have a
terrorist problem.
If, as neocons constantly allege, terrorists can smuggle nuclear weapons or
dirty bombs into the US with which to wreak havoc upon our cities, terrorists
can acquire weapons with which to assassinate any neocon or former government
official.
Yet, the neocons, who are the Americans most hated by Muslims, remain unscathed.
The "war on terror" is a hoax that fronts for American control of oil
pipelines, the profits of the military-security complex, the assault on civil
liberty by fomenters of a police state, and Israels territorial expansion.
There were no al Qaeda in Iraq until the Americans brought them there by
invading and overthrowing Saddam Hussein, who kept al Qaeda out of Iraq. The
Taliban is not a terrorist organization, but a movement attempting to unify
Afghanistan under Muslim law. The only Americans threatened by the Taliban are
the Americans
Bush sent to Afghanistan to kill Taliban and to impose a puppet state on the
Afghan people.
Hamas is the democratically elected government of Palestine, or what little
remains of Palestine after Israels illegal annexations. Hamas is a terrorist
organization in the same sense that the Israeli government and the US
government are terrorist organizations. In an effort to bring Hamas under
Israeli hegemony, Israel employs
terror bombing and assassinations against Palestinians. Hamas replies to the
Israeli terror with homemade and ineffectual rockets.
Hezbollah represents the Shiites of southern Lebanon, another area in the
Middle East that Israel seeks for its territorial expansion.
The US brands Hamas and Hezbollah "terrorist organizations" for no other reason
than the US is on Israels side of the conflict. There is no objective basis
for the US Department of States "finding" that Hamas and Hezbollah are
terrorist organizations. It is merely a propagandistic declaration.
Americans and Israelis do not call their bombings of civilians terror. What
Americans and Israelis call terror is the response of oppressed people who are
stateless because their countries are ruled by puppets loyal to the oppressors.
These people, dispossessed of their own countries, have no State Departments,
Defense
Departments, seats in the United Nations, or voices in the mainstream media.
They can submit to foreign hegemony or resist by the limited means available to
them.
The fact that Israel and the United States carry on endless propaganda to
prevent this fundamental truth from being realized indicates that it is Israel
and the US that are in the wrong and the Palestinians, Lebanese, Iraqis, and
Afghans who are being wronged.
The retired American generals who serve as war propagandists for Fox "News" are
forever claiming that Iran arms the Iraqi and Afghan insurgents and Hamas. But
where are the arms? To deal with American tanks, insurgents have to construct
homemade explosive devices out of artillery shells. After six years of conflict
the
insurgents still have no weapon against the American helicopter gunships.
Contrast this "arming" with the weaponry the US supplied to the Afghans three
decades ago when they were fighting to drive out the Soviets.
The films of Israels murderous assault on Gaza show large numbers of Gazans
fleeing from Israeli bombs or digging out the dead and maimed, and none of
these people are armed. A person would think that by now every Palestinian
would be armed, every man, woman, and child. Yet, all the films of the Israeli
attack show an
unarmed population. Hamas has to construct homemade rockets that are little
more than a sign of defiance. If Hamas were armed by Iran, Israels assault on
Gaza would have cost Israel its helicopter gunships, its tanks, and hundreds of
lives of its soldiers.
Hamas is a small organization armed with small caliber rifles incapable of
penetrating body armor. Hamas is unable to stop small bands of Israeli settlers
from descending on West Bank Palestinian villages, driving out the
Palestinians, and appropriating their land.
The great mystery is: why after 60 years of oppression are the Palestinians
still an unarmed people? Clearly, the Muslim countries are complicit with
Israel and the US in keeping the Palestinians unarmed.
The unsupported assertion that Iran supplies sophisticated arms to the
Palestinians is like the unsupported assertion that Saddam Hussein had weapons
of mass destruction. These assertions are propagandistic justifications for
killing Arab civilians and destroying civilian infrastructure in order to
secure US and Israeli hegemony
in the Middle East.
Source : http://vdare.com/roberts/090203_terror.htm
----<>----
Proof that the organized Jewish community opposes free speech
By Dr. Kevin MacDonald
It is something of an axiom of Jewish life that Is it good for the Jews?
remains the litmus test of Jewish communal activity - in other words, interest
over principles. A good example is free speech. There can be little doubt that
the organized Jewish community sees free speech as a problem because it may be
used to criticize the behavior of Jewish organizations and especially Israel.
In Canada the response of the organized Jewish community to recent
demonstrations against Israel was to attempt to invoke Canadas restrictions on
free speech in order to silence their critics. The Canadian Jewish Congress
complained that protests against Israels incursion into Gaza contained images
that were uncivil, un-Canadian, that demonize Jews and Israelis. They are
asking the police to investigate the matter for referral to the Canadian Human
Rights Commission which is in charge of enforcing laws that infringe on free
speech. Although the organized Jewish community in Canada has strongly
supported the thought crime legislation (see below), Bernie Farber, the head of
the CJC, stated we are firm supporters and believers in the need to be able to
demonstrate passionately in free and democratic societies.
Because of the First Amendment, we are still a ways from the situation in
Canada here in the US. Nevertheless, the ADL has been in the forefront of
promoting hate-crime legislation in America, and there can be little doubt that
they see the First Amendment as a barrier to their interests in suppressing
thoughts and speech critical of Israel and other Jewish interests.
An example of the efforts of the organized Jewish community in the direction of
thought control is the Global Anti-Semitism Review Act of 2004. This law
created an office of Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism within
the State Department, headed by Gregg J. Rickman. The act not only requires the
State Department to document acts of anti-Semitism, but also to combat acts of
anti-Semitism globally.
The act does not say what the U.S. must do to combat anti-Semitism around the
world. I assume combating anti-Semitism wouldnt require any more in the way of
lives and money than, say, the war in Iraq - another project spearheaded by
Jewish activism on behalf of Israel. But that may be wishful thinking as the
same activists are avidly promoting a war with Iran which would likely be even
more disastrous.
In any case, the office issued its most recent Contemporary Global
Anti-Semitism Report (GASR) in March of last year. The document is an excellent
example of Jewish activism that would be unremarkable except that it is now
officially ensconced at the highest reaches of the U.S. government. As we shall
see, it goes beyond criticizing anti-Jewish actions to anti-Jewish attitudes,
such as statements about Jewish influence.
The report performs the by now familiar casuistry on Israel as a cause of
anti-Semitism. The reader is led to believe that the allegations of Israeli
atrocities are overblown propaganda - when the real question is just how
Palestinians manage to survive at all in the occupied territories. The recent
horrifying incursion into Gaza is only the most recent example. Not only did
Israel carry out a starvation-inducing blockade during a ceasefire and an
assault that finally provoked Palestinian retaliation, there seems little doubt
that Israel committed war crimes - particularly the use of white phosphorus
bombs in densely populated civilian areas.
The report complains that Israels bad behavior is singled out while nobody
cares when other governments behave inhumanely. The problem here is that
because Israels bad behavior is an important ingredient in enflaming the
entire region, it should interest everyone. And because of the role of the
Israel Lobby in shaping American policy, Israels bad behavior is even more
properly the concern of all Americans. American taxpayers are not being asked
to massively subsidize other badly behaved governments, nor are they asked to
fight and die in wars designed to advance the interests of those governments.
The report graciously states that responsible criticism of Israels policies
is acceptable. (Thanks!) But theres a catch: Those criticizing Israel have a
responsibility to consider the effect their actions may have in prompting
hatred of Jews.
This, of course, has the effect of proscribing criticism of Israel for fear of
being called an anti-Semite. Presumably responsible criticism of Israel does
not include books like John Mearsheimer and Steven Walts The Israel Lobby,
despite its academic tone and masterful marshalling of evidence. Jewish
activists have routinely accused the authors of resurrecting the Protocols and
other vicious acts of anti-Semitism.
As the report notes, Israel is without doubt the source of most anti-Jewish
words and deeds in the contemporary world. But the report also points to
traditional Jewish stereotypes as a continuing concern: Jews as more loyal to
Israel and Jewish interests than the interests of their country of residence;
and Jews as having inordinate influence and control over media, the economy or
government. For example, according to ADL surveys, substantial percentages of
Europeans believe that Jews have too much power in business and in
international financial markets. (The percentages range from around 20% in
Germany to 60% in Hungary.)
Similarly, ADL surveys indicate that beliefs that Jews are disloyal are common
among Europeans, ranging from 39% in France to 60% in Spain. The report notes
that those who believe that Jews are more loyal to Israel than to their own
country tend to believe that Jewish lobbying groups and individual Jews in
influential positions in national governments seek to bend policy toward
Israels interests.
In other words, these anti-Semites are living under the illusion that
organizations like AIPAC actually have some influence. And they may even
believe that highly placed Jews like Paul Wolfowitz, Elliott Abrams and Richard
Perle may have steered U.S. policy in a way that benefited Israel to the
detriment of the United States.
As I noted in my review of Mearsheimer and Walt,
Pro-Israel activists such as Perle typically phrase their policy
recommendations as aimed at benefiting the United States. Perle does this
despite evidence that he has a strong Jewish identity and despite the fact that
he has typical Jewish concerns, such as anti-Semitism, the Holocaust, and the
welfare of Israel. Perle poses as an American patriot despite credible charges
of spying for Israel, writing reports for Israeli think tanks and op-eds for
the Jerusalem Post, and maintaining close personal relationships with Israeli
leaders.
Needless to say, the GASR is not a good place to find nuanced or fair
treatments of these issues.
The GASR also has a section deploring ethnic nationalist movements of non-Jews,
mainly in Eastern Europe, complaining that these movements are commonly
anti-Jewish. Typically the anti-Jewish sentiments of such movements stem from
the perception that Jews are an elite with considerable power and that this
elite opposes the ethno-nationalism of non-Jews-a view that certainly has some
basis in reality. (Jewish opposition to ethno-nationalism is restricted to
non-Jews in areas where Jews form a Diaspora; it does not, of course, apply to
Israel.)
For example, the GASR singles out Roman Catholic institutions as encouraging
anti-Semitism and ethnic and religious chauvinism. Chief among the offenders
is a conservative Catholic radio station in Poland, Radio Maryja, cited for
claiming that Jews were pushing the Polish government to pay exorbitant
private property restitution claims [for Holocaust reparations], and that
Polands President was in the pocket of the Jewish lobby.
This seems odd, since it would hardly be surprising if indeed Jews and Jewish
organizations were pressuring the Polish government on this issue. Indeed,
Norman Finkelstein points out:
In negotiations with Eastern Europe, Jewish organizations and Israel have
demanded the full restitution of or monetary compensation for the pre-war
communal and private assets of the Jewish community. Consider Poland. The
pre-war Jewish population of Poland stood at 3.5 million; the current
population is several thousand. Yet, the World Jewish Restitution Organization
demands title over the 6,000 pre-war communal Jewish properties, including
those currently being used as hospitals and schools. It is also laying claim to
hundreds of thousands of parcels of Polish land valued in the many tens of
billions of dollars. Once again the entire US political and legal establishment
has been mobilized to achieve these ends. Indeed, New York City Council members
unanimously supported a resolution calling on Poland to pass comprehensive
legislation providing for the complete restitution of Holocaust assets, while
57 members of Congress (led by Congressman Anthony Weiner of New York) dis
patched a letter to the Polish parliament demanding comprehensive legislation
that would return 100% of all property and assets seized during the Holocaust.
No sign of Jewish involvement there. Clearly, Radio Marija is way out of line.
Incidentally, Finkelstein has paid dearly for offending the Israel Lobby:
blacklisted from employment in the academic world, deported and barred from
Israel, and living in a rent-stabilized apartment near his boyhood home in
Brooklyn. The Lobby clearly believes in free speech so long as its done in
ones closet and assuming the neighbors cant hear it. (More on this below.)
Also related to Poland, the GASR notes that Maciej Giertych, European
Parliament Deputy and former head of the Political Party League of Polish
Families, wrote a booklet suggesting that Jews were unethical and a tragic
community because they did not accept Jesus as the Messiah. The report also
deplored the ADLs finding that 39% of Polish respondents agreed that Jews are
responsible for the death of Christ.
This is truly amazing. Here we have an official U.S. government report
condemning a Polish politician and a large percentage of the Polish people for
expressing religious ideas that date from the origins of the Church in
antiquity. Its very reminiscent of the situation in Canada where the Christian
Heritage Party has been charged with promoting hatred because they published
material opposing homosexuality for religious reasons stemming from their
reading of the Bible.
Incidentally, the GASR complains that Giertych also claimed that Jews create
their own ghettos because they like to separate themselves from others.
Residential segregation, of course, was standard Jewish behavior in the
Diaspora beginning in the ancient world, and it certainly occurred in Poland
well into modern times. Indeed, it continues in many areas of the Diaspora
today. But, as with thought crimes generally, truth is no defense.
The GASR coyly states that While the report describes many measures that
foreign governments have adopted to combat anti-Semitism, it does not endorse
any such measures that prohibit conduct that would be protected under the U.S.
Constitution.
Nevertheless, the act requires the compilation of material that would
presumably be protected by the US Constitution, in particular instances of
propaganda in government and nongovernment media that attempt to justify or
promote racial hatred
against Jewish people. When one considers that a great
many of the attitudes mentioned in the GASR are either substantially factual or
reflect common religious beliefs, they would certainly seem to fall within the
protections of the First Amendment.
And its pretty clear where its heart lies. Indeed, as Ezra Levant has recently
described, Jewish organizations and activists have been a major source of
support for the Canadian Human Rights Commission, intervening in dozens of
cases in favor of plaintiffs. Levant describes the Simon Weisenthal Center as
one of the most vicious interveners in Canadian Human Rights Commission
censorship trials. And Bernie Farber of the Canadian Jewish Congress stated
recently that our anti-hate laws are probably the most underused. Levant
comments: That sounds like Ian Fine, senior counsel for the CHRC, who declared
that there cant be enough laws against hate. So while the rest of the
country is realizing that our government censorship has gone too far, Farber
says it goes nowhere far enough; its underused. He wants more censorship, more
government intervention into thoughts and ideas - and the emotion called
hate.
Clearly the office of Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism is
nothing if not a Jewish activist organization. And it doubtless would love to
institute the same kinds of thought control in the U.S. that have made Canada
into a police state. Indeed, it would be entirely within the letter of the law
that created this monster if the United States were to declare war on Poland as
a means of combating anti-Semitism. At least it wont be necessary to invade
Canada.
Source with hyperlinks :
http://www.davidduke.com/general/proof-that-the-organized-jewish-community-opposes-free-speech_7434.html
-------------------------------------
You or someone using your email adress is currently subscribed to the Lawrence
Auster
Newletter. If you wish to unsubscribe from our mailing list, please let us know
by calling "to 1 212 865 1284
Thanks,
Lawrence Auster,
238 W 101 St Apt. 3B
New York, NY 10025
Contact: [email protected]
-------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-code mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
