On Mon, 18 Jul 2005, Joerg Schilling wrote: > John Plocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Is it important (as an architectural goal...) that we could say > > "runs on OpenSolaris[1]" > > in the face of multiple "OpenSolaris based" distros? > > > > That is, if someone develops an application for "Sun's Nevada release", > > *should* we expect it to, at a binary compatable level, just run > > correctly on any other OpenSolaris-based distro? > > You cannot :-(
Don't you mean: until Sun re-licenses its libm you cannont? > > The reason is that I am only able to work as much on libm as I have > time between other thasks. Fot this reason, libm cannot be a complete > Sun libm replacement but only serves the software I did test so far. > > This is why testing on/for Schillix is so important as long as Sun > does not opensource enough bits from Solaris. > > > J?rg > > -- > EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) J?rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni) > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ > URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily > _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
