UNIX admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Your point being? That bash does implement some sort
> > of Bourne/POSIX
> > shell command language instead of the csh one?
> > Ridiculous.
> I wasn't trying to make a point that bash is more or less POSIX.
No, you were claiming (you should not have removed the quoting of
your own previous posting) that
| There are far better shells, namely (pd)ksh, [...]
but your example was pointless because (pd)ksh behaves exactly as
bash there.
> I was trying to make a point that bash is not very good, contrary
> to the popular [I][B]trends and beliefs[/B][/I].
You failed. And since you are nothing but the "UNIX admin" who is
using a hotmail address, there is nothing beyond your example that
might serve to give your claim any credibility.
Gunnar
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
