On Mon, 18 Jul 2005, Glynn Foster wrote:
> Hey,
>
> > > ... I see a similar trend in Linux attempting to be birthed even now:
> > > http://www.componentizedlinux.org/. The idea of a similar project
> > > being birthed for OpenSolaris is an exciting thing to me...
> >
> > I second that, bigtime.  So my instincts tell me that the main issue
> > that needs to be focused on ASAP is the base-library problem that James
> > and others have mentioned. In other words, before any trans-project
> > discussion (about a unified approach) can make much headway, it seems
> > to me that the base-library problem has to get resolved first. Two
> > projects have addressed it, but the others have not. More on this later...
>
> So I wonder if half the problem that componentized Linux tries to solve
> is the fact that so many things fail from a binary compatibility. It's
> not clear to me that the added complexity at a package level [and it
> seems substantial] is worth the gain. Thoughts?
>
> > SchilliX and the Pkgsrc projects are solving the missing base-libraries
> > problem by using the SPS-provided ones; but as far as I know, the
> > Blastware, JDS/RPM, and Portage projects have not addressed what
> > they're going to do about missing base-libraries.
>
> I'd personally be advocating to work with upstream Solaris to make those
> base libraries readily available - and I think there's real value for
> other projects to be doing something similar, however stressful it might
> be getting that to happen ;)

No disagreement here. Of course one big concern is that it's possible
some critical files will have to stay encumbered (not even re-licensed
for binary redistribution). So we should probably think carefully early
on about how to deal with that should it occur.

Come to think of it, maybe a goal should be to do a first release (of a
community-supported desktop distro) that is not 100% open-source. At
least that way, if the re-licensing process takes a long time, we could
still get a distro out there while we're waiting.

Eric
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Reply via email to