Alvaro Lopez Ortega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > They (Debian) deliberately apply non portable patches on my software
> > and they did even complain when I rejected to include the patches
> > for the official release _because_ they would break the software.
>
> IMO each one played its role. They cared about Debian/Linux which is
> right thing to as long as it is the only real platform, and you
> cared about cdrecord rejecting those patches. It is the natural way,
> it can not see a big problem here. I didn't follow that much, so
> probably I'm missing something.
And if we like to support OpenSolaris, we need to go a way that
cares in the first place about OpenSolaris. Please don't try to enforce
a Debian/Solaris in case the Debian folks is not fully engaged.
We need to set up a working community for OpenSolaris instead of
trying to convince people from other camps.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
