> > On Mon, 2005-07-25 at 15:30, Roy T. Fielding > wrote: > > But I went googling for differences and found a > > pretty significant one: > > > > It looks like ksh88 uses dynamic scoping while > ksh93 >
Opps I appologize for the missing data in the last message. To get an idea of the significant numbers there was a thread posted on this subject on research.att.com from David: ------------- * To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Subject: Re: Re: functions and locals (was Re: ksh93 features that might be considered) * From: David Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 23:36:51 -0400 (EDT) * Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > David Korn wrote: > > > > Another mistake I made in ksh88 was to use dynamic scoping. The > > drawbacks to dynamical scoping were pointed out to me by some > > programming language gurus. Since the type of scoping was > > never defined anywhere in ksh88, ksh93 switched to static scoping. > > Did the switch cause many complaints? After further thought I am > convinced that static scoping is the better of the two. I received no complaints during the first year. Since then I have received about one complaint a year about it. Once I explain how to modify the script so that it can work with both new and old version, I have not heard back. ---------------- If we consider risks how many prorpietary customers would this affect on the ON release? Or is it difficult to come up with numbers. ---Bob This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org