Eric Boutilier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > I have two problems (or potential problems) with your assertions...
> > >
> > > Funny thing is (and the crux of this misunderstanding): there isn't
> > > any such thing as "OpenSolaris" per se in the context in which Roy used
> > > above. There is Nevada -- which is Sun's "distro" -- and there is
> > > SchilliX -- which is the SchilliX team's "distro".
> >
> > OpenSolaris is opensolaris-src-20050720.tar.bz2 and in Sparc/x86...
>
> Mmmm sort of. In some contexts you are right. But certainly not in the
> context in which it is used above.
If you believe I am not right, then we would need to avoid the term
OpenSolaris at all.
Do you have a better definition?
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
