On 7/27/05, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bill Sommerfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 08:43, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > > We have either _no_ ksh in OpenSolaris or we have ksh93.
> >
> > or we have pdksh, which is a lot closer to ksh88.
> 
> The last time I did read something about pdksh, people were
> disappointed about the compatibility. I don't remember why,
> but this impression in my memory made me believe that pdksh
> is no option.

I think they were trying to point out that pdksh would make a good
starting point or reference to begin implementing a replacement for
ksh88, or to add the necessary compatability to ksh93. I don't think
anyone was implying that pdksh could be used as a drop-in replacement
(at least I don't think so).

-- 
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Reply via email to