> ok, this one doesn't count, you reply show up in the
> end.
>
> but how about this one.
>
> http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=2
> 475&tstart=0
>
> Rich Teer followed up on my posting this mornig, I
> got two emails like above example
> but I still don't see his posting on Forum thread.
> Unfortunately I deleted both email regarding Rich'
> reply.
1. Acutally, I didn't delete Rich' email here is his email reply.
>From : Rich Teer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent : Friday, September 23, 2005 10:32 AM
To : TJ Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC : opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject : Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Solaris 10 and OpenSolaris
Go to previous message | Go to next message | Delete |
Inbox
On Fri, 23 Sep 2005, TJ Yang wrote:
> I think your answer is at Terminology section of this url
http://opensolaris.org/os/community/tools/building_opensolaris/
Thanks for the plug. :-)
The long-awaited seconf (and final) part of that series is nearing
completion.
> and the better question is
>
> "Are OpenSolaris and Solaris 11 the same ?"
The answer is much the same (forgetting for th emoment that there's
no such thing as S11 just yet!). S11 will be a distro based on
OpenSolaris, and will no doubt have Sun value-added bits.
--
Rich Teer, SCNA, SCSA, OpenSolaris CAB member
President,
Rite Online Inc.
Voice: +1 (250) 979-1638
URL: http://www.rite-group.com/rich
2. Argh, I think I know why, after reading Rich email.
Looks like he replied to my post using email instead of posting his reply
on the Forum::Dicusssion directly. So may be his email reply is awaiting
approval from at Email-Forum gateway.
If this is the case, then no complains. We need this feature to
prevent spam mail.
Sorry, disturbing the peace here.
tj
>
> Not a big deal, it is just FYI for the Forum
> administrator. and I am
> the only one complain, it must be my bad ;)
>
> tj
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
