Jumping in...from the docs community perspective, it would be great to 
have a repository for technical design documentation as proposed here. 
Documentation (design, arc, admin, user, dev, etc.) cuts across the 
whole of the OpenSolaris project and should be a top-level item when 
you arrive at opensolaris.org. Otherwise, folks have to drill into 
each community and project to find technical info (boring) and people 
can't get a big-picture view of all the documents available to them or 
see where they might fill a gap, learn something new, or get help 
independently (confusing). Bug 6370879 was filed on this, but hasn't 
been implemented yet.

-Michelle

>X-Original-To: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
>Delivered-To: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
>Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 17:13:55 -0600
>From: Eric Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Community proposal: solaris-internals
>To: Alan Coopersmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>MIME-version: 1.0
>Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
>User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060113)
>Cc: Nils Nieuwejaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org, Stephen Hahn 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>X-BeenThere: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
>X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4
>List-Id: General OpenSolaris Discussion List 
<opensolaris-discuss.opensolaris.org>
>List-Unsubscribe: 
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-discuss>, 
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
e>
>List-Archive: 
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-discuss>
>List-Post: <mailto:opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org>
>List-Help: 
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>List-Subscribe: 
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-discuss>, 
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> Things were setup that way before projects existed and everything 
had to be
>> a community.   The "Nevada" community (which is misnamed to begin 
with), 
>> should
>> become a ONNV project of an ON community which could also host your 
>> internals
>> information.
>
>... and proposed discussion list(s).
>
>Agreed, this proposed structure does sound a lot more sensible than 
the 
>current way it's set up.
>
>- Eric
>_______________________________________________
>opensolaris-discuss mailing list
>opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Reply via email to