On 3/10/06, Felix Schulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/7/06, Roland Mainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Felix Schulte wrote:
> > >
> > > On 3/6/06, Keith M Wesolowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 07:09:32PM +0100, Felix Schulte wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > We only have Studio 11 installed as it is the only "free" version -
> > > > > Studio 10 is not free of charge.
> > > >
> > > > We've been over this before on IRC. Studio 10 is free of charge. See
> > > > the license terms at
> > > > http://opensolaris.org/os/community/tools/sun_studio_tools/sssent/.
> > > > IIRC your problem is the "Provided that You are a participant of the
> > > > OpenSolaris community" phrase and the fact that you insist on doing
> > > > OpenSolaris development on machines which your lawyers have told you
> > > > are accessible to people who do not meet that requirement. While
> > > > there are solid policy and technical ways around this (such as making
> > > > the compilers executable only by a specific group and then adding all
> > > > "participant[s] in the OpenSolaris community" to that group), we can't
> > > > force you to implement them.
> > > >
> > > > The constructive solutions available to you are:
> > > >
> > > > 1. Use gcc instead. There are 22 open bugs that affect ON when built
> > > > with gcc, most of which cause compilation failure and are trivial to
> > > > fix. Use the gcc 3.4.3 delivered with Solaris Express build 22 or
> > > > later. I can't comment on other consolidations' gcc-readiness.
> > [snip]
> >
> > Please NO gcc builds.
> Why?
Again: WHY?
--
_ Felix Schulte
_|_|_ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(0 0)
ooO--(_)--Ooo
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
