Mike Kupfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree that software outside of ON should not rely on the current
> libcmd.
>
> And this probably doesn't need to be said, but just so we're all on the
> same page: if the current libcmd goes away, some sort of library should
> take its place. Rewriting all the current libcmd consumers to do their
> own /etc/default parsing would be a step in the wrong direction.
How about a libdeflt like it is used by the Schily tools?
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
