Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 04:19:43AM +0200, Roland Mainz wrote:
> > > One option would be to write a patch which changes all scripts within on
> > > from
> > > -- snip --
> > > #!/bin/sh
> > > -- snip --
> > > to
> > > -- snip --
> > > #!/bin/env sh
> > > -- snip --
> > > which would then pick-up the first occurence of "sh" in ${PATH}. Would
> > > this be an acceptable change ?
> >
> > Keith/Casper: Would that be OK for you ?
>
> In your testing workspace, sure. In ON, no. We want fewer things to
> depend on your PATH, not more. Otherwise you end up with mysterious
> failures where things work fine for everyone else.
I just checked it - the "bldenv" script resets ${PATH} to a predefined
value. Unless someone expliclity resets ${PATH} to another value this
will not cause any problems (yes, the ${PATH} set by "bldenv" includes
"." (=current directory) - but that entry comes AFTER /usr/bin/ (where
"ksh" and "sh" are picked-up) so this will not cause problems either.
----
Bye,
Roland
--
__ . . __
(o.\ \/ /.o) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer
/O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 7950090
(;O/ \/ \O;)
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
