> On 7/12/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >I see lots of complaints from people about install processes for >> >Linux, Solaris, BSD, etc. -- but not too many people that are willing >> >to admit that the Windows install process isn't a very "aesthe tic" >> >experience either. >> >> That's likely because few people ever run a barebones windows install. >> >> And if they do, they often run vendor recovery disks which know >> more about the specific hardware. > > True, but it's still one of those things that bugs me. The recovery > CDs are of course especially evil, since people really like the > polished expiernce they provide, but want it to work for all hardware, > not realising that in many cases it was made specifically for their > system configuration!
I just recently installed Windows XP Pro dual CPU edition on a machine and it was onto a bare machine. Worked fine and looked fine. When one considers that you need to cut off and arm, leg, and some really important body parts in order to pay for it then I expect something real snazzy looking. Now if I could just get over the gross security flaws and the whole "reboot now" thing. Dennis _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org