>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> >> >If this is the case, Sun should back it up and make sure that it does stand >> >on >> >it's own, and get a statement from the GPL folks (or Debian) that they do >> >accept it as an open source free license. >> >> Why? OSI is what matters and OSI has made CDDL one of 9 "preferred" >> licenses. > >Casper, could you please send a pointer to OSI for this claim? > >I would like to use this with Debian....
The OSI is writing a license proliferation report; a draft can be found here: http://www.crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3:mss:11636:200607:nknhhdligldemhkfbhpd Casper _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
