>Did you really look at the differences? Yes
>They removed the information about the fact that the CDDL has been selected as >one of 9 preferred licenses and they removed a hint on a link that is just a >collection of all false claims on the CDDL. Both information is there. Line 1: "The CDDL is one of the 9 preferred licenses listed by the OSI" and Line 17 (External Links): [http://members.optusnet.com.au/benjamincarlyle/benjamin/blog/2005/02/04#cddl CDDL Analysis Summary] The only difference is, that your sentence " that collects all wrong claims on the CDDL" was removed. This would be the part that I would write under a new section "controversy". Mika # mv Disclaimer.txt /dev/null ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This message is intended for the addressee only and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended receiver, any disclosure, copying to any person or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on this e-mail, is prohibited and may be un- lawful. You must therefore delete this e-mail. Internet communications may not be secure or error-free and may contain viruses. They may be subject to possible data corruption, accidental or on purpose. This e-mail is not and should not be construed as an offer or the solicitation of an offer to purchase or subscribe or sell or redeem any investments. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
