Hello, Short version:
I have SiL 3112 cards that are listed as expected by scanpci -v, but the 3112 does not appear at all in "prtconf -D", only the 6112 RAID controller chipset on the same card shows up. Long version: I have a machine with a SiL3512 in it that works fine. I needed four more SATA disks so I purchased a 3114 which did not work (and I saw suggestions that it only worked after flashing into legacy mode). I then purchased a couple of SiL 3112 based controllers that I "knew" would work. Unfortunately they don't. The SiL 3112 is detected fine by scanpci -v: pci bus 0x0000 cardnum 0x09 function 0x00: vendor 0x1095 device 0x3112 Silicon Image, Inc. SiI 3112 [SATALink/SATARaid] Serial ATA Controller CardVendor 0x1095 card 0x6112 (Silicon Image, Inc. SiI 3112 SATARaid Controller) STATUS 0x02b0 COMMAND 0x0007 CLASS 0x01 0x04 0x00 REVISION 0x02 BIST 0x00 HEADER 0x00 LATENCY 0x20 CACHE 0x08 BASE0 0x0000d501 addr 0x0000d500 I/O BASE1 0x0000d601 addr 0x0000d600 I/O BASE2 0x0000d701 addr 0x0000d700 I/O BASE3 0x0000d801 addr 0x0000d800 I/O BASE4 0x0000d901 addr 0x0000d900 I/O BASE5 0xee081000 addr 0xee081000 MEM MAX_LAT 0x00 MIN_GNT 0x00 INT_PIN 0x01 INT_LINE 0x0b However, prtconf -D just yields: pci1095,6112 The 1096,6112 seems to be the RAID controller chipset on the card, which I don't care about. The 1096,3112 is not listed anywhere at all in prtconf output. I have tried adding an entry to /etc/driver_aliases to map pci1095,6112 to "pci-ide" aswell as "ata" - no effect. It is interesting that the scanpci entry for the 3512 does not include a CardVendor: pci bus 0x0000 cardnum 0x08 function 0x00: vendor 0x1095 device 0x3512 Silicon Image, Inc. SiI 3512 [SATALink/SATARaid] Serial ATA Controller STATUS 0x02b0 COMMAND 0x0007 CLASS 0x01 0x80 0x00 REVISION 0x01 BIST 0x00 HEADER 0x00 LATENCY 0x20 CACHE 0x08 BASE0 0x0000d001 addr 0x0000d000 I/O BASE1 0x0000d101 addr 0x0000d100 I/O BASE2 0x0000d201 addr 0x0000d200 I/O BASE3 0x0000d301 addr 0x0000d300 I/O BASE4 0x0000d401 addr 0x0000d400 I/O BASE5 0xee080000 addr 0xee080000 MEM MAX_LAT 0x00 MIN_GNT 0x00 INT_PIN 0x01 INT_LINE 0x0a BYTE_0 0x02 BYTE_1 0x00 BYTE_2 0x00 BYTE_3 0x00 Could it be that the 3112 is somehow "hidden", from a driver point of view, behing the 6119? I am not that familiar with how PCI works. The prtconf -D tree for the 3512 looks like this: pci-ide, instance #0 (driver name: pci-ide) ide, instance #0 (driver name: ata) cmdk, instance #0 (driver name: cmdk) ide, instance #1 (driver name: ata) cmdk, instance #2 (driver name: cmdk) Is the 6112 supposed to be in the same position as the pci-ide node for the 3512? The card is a "VSCom" card, whatever that is. Suppose it's just re-branding or something. Any feedback would be appreciated. I am a Solaris newbie (having only done BSD/Linux in the past), so perhaps I am missing something obvious. -- / Peter Schuller, InfiDyne Technologies HB PGP userID: 0xE9758B7D or 'Peter Schuller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>' Key retrieval: Send an E-Mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.scode.org _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org