> > Please phrase questions with "in OpenSolaris". > > You know, it's quite unfair to treat Solaris 10 as a > second class citizen because we want to show how > "open" OpenSolaris is to the potential Linux > converts. > > That's about as nice and as politically correct as I > could put it. With lots and lots of restraining on my > part. > > To add insult to injury, when a statement like that > comes from a Solaris kernel engineer, it's like > packing salt in a really raw wound.
Except that: * this is opensolaris.org * OpenSolaris is Nevada, not Solaris 10; different problems, new (and EOLd) features * there are other places to go for Solaris 10 and earlier: http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/home/ news:comp.unix.solaris (http://groups.google.com/groups?group=comp.unix.solaris) etc. and probably, * if you're using a fully supported release, you ought to be paying $$ so they can keep coming up with cool stuff... As long as someone either tries to answer a question anyway (and the person in question has probably the longest/most active history of answering questions in public forums of anyone from Sun that I can think of, so if it were me, I'd cut him a _lot_ of slack), or at least isn't too much of a jerk about it, I don't see the problem if they remind the OP that there are other places to go to talk about commercially supported Solaris releases. In this case, I think that was done quite mildly, I think. This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
