>On Feb 5, 2008 4:50 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >/bin/sh is something different, it is not a Korn Shell but a Bourne S= >> >hell. >> >> And it cannoit really be made compatible without breaking ksh. >> >> (And while we can fix our scripts to work fine with ksh/ksh93, >> customer scripts breakage will be different) > >I'm not convinced of that yet.
It's trivial to write a script which behaves different under ksh93 than it would under /bin/sh and which contains valid "sh" syntax. Casper _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
