"Josh Hurst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 7, unfortunately, is not as it requires replacing /bin/sh with /bin/bash
> > and that, I think, it something few would be willing to do.
>
> FYI Ubuntu uses dash as /bin/sh and Suse will use dash in the future.
> ksh93 has been discussed but it needs to be licensed as LGPL or GPL
> before Suse can use ksh93 as /bin/sh.
Who has the missconception with licenses, it is suse or did you missunderstand
things?
Thanks to a long "fight" from David Korn "against" AT&T, ksh93 is under an
approved "free" OpenSource license since ~ 5 years.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
