On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Herschel Krustofsky
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've really been looking forward to b95, as it incorporates Firefox 3.01 
> (apparently better than the one from mozilla.org) as well as other fixes. I'm 
> even hoping it installs on a laptop with ACPI rather than immediate panic. :-)
>
> Unfortunately, the b95 download is clearly broken. The 1 DVD ISO download 
> reports 473 MB on the screen (obviously wrong), and even when you click thru 
> to download (without SDM), you get a 404. The 2 DVD ISO download seems like 
> it is the right size, but again you get the 404.
>
> Even when the files are in place, as mentioned above, the network performance 
> is wretched. On 100 MB downstream connections, I've never gotten more than 
> 400 Kb/s download & usually get around 100 Kb/s.  That's at best 50 % slower 
> than most Linux distros & worse, slower than downloads from Microsoft.  This 
> is from Sun, "the network is the computer" !

Yep - DLC sucks, always has, always will.  It's broken (TM).

> I get the feeling that most folks inside of Sun use the internal build 
> servers & never deal with this stuff, so maybe no one is paying attention.
>
> I agree completely with Bruno, getting the distribution out there properly is 
> a showstopper.

Agreed.  Its unprofessional and makes Sun look like amateur hour.

Regards,

-- 
Al Hopper  Logical Approach Inc,Plano,TX [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                   Voice: 972.379.2133 Timezone: US CDT
OpenSolaris Governing Board (OGB) Member - Apr 2005 to Mar 2007
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/ogb/ogb_2005-2007/
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Reply via email to