James Carlson <[email protected]> wrote: > barun parichha writes: > > I don't know, why both of them deviate from the basic open source > > format, which creates extra confusion. > > If you're reporting a problem, I suggest filing a bug instead. > > As for the variations on process state in 'ps' between OSes, I don't > see a problem. There's a lot of alignment between them (in > particular, at least [STZ] are identical, and [R] is quite similar), > and in the places where they're not exactly the same, they're > reflecting differences in the underlying system implementation. > > Solaris isn't Linux, so process status on Solaris shouldn't > necessarily be the same as on Linux, should it?
There was a non-clean statement in barun's mail. "Linux/UNIX" does not make sense as Solaris _is_ UNIX, but Linux is not. The ps command is in the POSIX standard but the standard does not include a defined output format for the WCHAN. see: http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/ps.html Jörg -- EMail:[email protected] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin [email protected] (uni) [email protected] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
