April fool or not..there is a serious side here.Is the uncertainty hitting user adoption rates or churn? Would it be a good idea to simply look at a mid term programe this year to rewrite or replace many of the non opensource packages to close the gap and silence critics? Maybe this is just good house keeping ..pity it takes away resources from other development innovations? Clearly I read into this a confusion on the publics part between Solaris and Opensolaris brands which comes down to marketing weakness? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
- Re: [osol-discuss] Save OpenSolaris (according to Ka... Matthew Nawrocki
- Re: [osol-discuss] Save OpenSolaris (according t... Martin Bochnig
- Re: [osol-discuss] Save OpenSolaris (accordi... Matthew Nawrocki
- Re: [osol-discuss] Save OpenSolaris (acc... Martin Bochnig
- Re: [osol-discuss] Save OpenSolaris (according to Ka... Martin Bochnig
- Re: [osol-discuss] Save OpenSolaris (according t... Martin Bochnig
- Re: [osol-discuss] Save OpenSolaris (according t... Matthew Nawrocki
- Re: [osol-discuss] Save OpenSolaris (according to Katonda... Ian Collins
- Re: [osol-discuss] Save OpenSolaris (according to Katonda... Mike La Spina
- Re: [osol-discuss] Save OpenSolaris (according to Katonda... Anon Y Mous
- Re: [osol-discuss] Save OpenSolaris (according to Ka... Peter Jones
- Re: [osol-discuss] Save OpenSolaris (according to Katonda... Charles Hedrick
- Re: [osol-discuss] Save OpenSolaris (according to Ka... Martin Bochnig