On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 3:26 PM, bsd <[email protected]> wrote: > > I've said it before, that I personally don't know why Oracle would spend > millions developing Solaris 10 and spend millions developing OpenSolaris when > OpenSolaris isn't a revenue generator. I don't buy into "it's the > development model" line either. Funny that I never heard it was the > development model when OpenSolaris was initially released. Would have > thought that would have been stated. And never heard that with the 2008 and > 2009 releases. I only started hearing that in the last few months.
You've only been listening for a few months then. That OpenSolaris is the development effort for the next release of Solaris has always been the case. It's been that way for over 5 years. (That it has always been the case has meant that it's not necessary to shout it from the rooftops all the time.) > It is two months past the release date for 03.2010 and not a word. It is not any time since the release date, because the published release date is "first half of calendar year 2010", ie, before the end of June. -- -Peter Tribble http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
