> Hi > > I have read Ben Rockwood's Blog post before your > answer and I understand and agree with what he says. > Until Oracle doesn't break silence, there's almost > nothing other than their silence on what we can judge > what OpenSolaris' future according to Oracle might > be, i.e. as DB Appliance or Storage OS in Fishworks. > > I just wanted to say that Solaris is a much bigger > piece for Oracle to bite than VirtualBox and > OpenOffice are. Also OOO.org has considerably bigger > community contributions than OpenSolaris. That would > partly explain why Oracle keeps more time mumbling in > silence what they want to do with a full-blown OS > that awaits quite much of work but great potential > but with a community that keeps asking ;-) > > Keep up waiting a little more now that FY10 Q1 > results have been published. We have to accept Oracle > has another way of communication and collaboration > (citing Ben: "scaffolding") > - Well at least I hope it's worth to do so.
Appears Nexenta Core 3 is about to be release soon it's already on RC1, it's based on OpenSolaris build b134. I don't have anything against nexenta but i will not be a happy camper if core 3 igets released before new stable release of OpenSolaris that is also supposed to be from the same build as nexenta core 3, build 134. http://www.nexenta.org/news/14 -- This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
