> Edward Martinez wrote: > > I do consider 134 as an RC because it was said > last year that next stable release would be 2010.02 > and be based from b 134 but how would that be > possible, if build 134 was released on march 8? > > It wouldn't be, which is why that was never said. > > When the plan was originally made for 2010.02, it was > going to use build 132. > When the plan shifted last fall to 2010.03, it also > shifted to build 134. > > (Contrary to mistaken belief by many people, 2010.02 > didn't slip at the last > minute - the plans changed months in advance to > better align with other > schedules.) > > -- > -Alan Coopersmith- > - alan.coopersm...@oracle.com > Oracle Solaris Platform Engineering: X Window > ow System > > _______________________________________________ > opensolaris-discuss mailing list > opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org >
thanks, with this explanations has taken away any misconceptions i had, now I'm more concinved that opensolaris is here for enternity -- This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
