Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersm...@oracle.com> wrote:
> joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
> > Gabriele Bulfon <gbul...@sonicle.com> wrote:
> >
> >> That's great ;) and....what are the missing features compared to latest
> >> OpenSolaris dev? (if any...)
> >
> > If you like to compare SchilliX with OpenSolaris, nothing is missing.
> > If you compare SchilliX to Indiana, things look different.
> >
> > From the discussion of Licenses, it seems that Indiana is not made of
> > redistributable code only.
>
> The distro named "OpenSolaris", originally created by the Indiana project,
> contains only redistributable code in the install media & main IPS
> repositories,
> though some of that is closed source binaries released under licenses like
> the OSBL.
Does this mean, I could bundle the data from /usr/lib/locale/* with SchilliX?
> All packages containing code which is not redistributable are isolated
> to the /extra repository.
Given the fact that
pkg search cc
does not show any /extra in the output, does this mean I could bundle the
studio compiler with SchilliX?
I am a bit confused. I am willing to believe you but several people did write
different claims before.
Jörg
--
EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
j...@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni)
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog:
http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
