Hi Seb,
> (I assume bridge mode is being used)? Yes, that is correct, I'll try the other "modes" later on. I did a scratch install of the zone, and I got the same results. In any case, I'd submit a bug against virtualbox. +1 On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Sebastien Roy <sebastien....@oracle.com>wrote: > On 11/15/11 12:43 AM, Mike Gerdts wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 11:25 PM, Deniz Rende<deniz.re...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> It could be that this anet resource automatically picked the wrong >>>> lower link. From the global zone, what do "dladm show-link" and >>>> "ipadm show-addr" say? >>>> >>> >>> I get the following information: >>> root@solaris11:~# dladm show-link >>> LINK CLASS MTU STATE OVER >>> net0 phys 1500 up -- >>> zdev1/net0 vnic 1500 up net0 >>> root@solaris11:~# ipadm show-addr >>> ADDROBJ TYPE STATE ADDR >>> lo0/v4 static ok 127.0.0.1/8 >>> net0/v4 static ok 192.168.1.20/24 >>> lo0/v6 static ok ::1/128 >>> net0/v6 addrconf ok fe80::a00:27ff:fe22:cf2f/10 >>> I don't know if it worths to mention but the version of Solaris 11 is the >>> text install....I also don't have any trouble GZ networking: >>> root@solaris11:~# ping www.google.com >>> www.google.com is alive >>> >> >> I suspect that what is happening is that the zdev1/net0 vnic thinks it >> is OK to allocate another MAC (Ethernet) address but virtualbox isn't >> happy with it and thinks something in the VM is trying to spoof >> packets There may be a way within virtualbox to disable this >> behavior, but I've not used virtualbox recently enough to remember. >> > > Perhaps try different virtualbox networking "modes" (I assume bridge mode > is being used)? In any case, I'd submit a bug against virtualbox. > > -Seb > -- Deniz Rende Web: http://www.machine-unix.com
_______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
