Richard L. Hamilton <rlha...@smart.net> wrote:
> Since Opera is fast and leaks memory less than Firefox, this stinks.
>
> Has anyone ported Chromium (the open source of Chrome) to Solaris?
> That wouldn't do all the other stuff that Opera does, but it would make
> an impressive browser.  It _would_ do one thing that Opera does, namely
> provide a rendering engine alternative to Firefox and Seamonkey.
> WebKit does pretty well - I have very few times when I have to use
> Firefox instead of Safari on my Mac.

Yes, this sucks. But it was not Operas fault. It was Oracle which
stepped over the line.

The short story is:
The Opera staff asked - as usual - for help to circumvent a Solaris
bug. The (new) response, totally the opposite from Sun's helpful
behavior of the past was:
1. Opera did not purchase support for Solaris
2. Without support Oracle will not answer technical questions or
provide ANY help
3. Opera uses the SOLARIS trademark without permission
4. Opera will have to buy a full year of support for 502018 Euro to
obtain questions to their answers

502018 Euro for WHAT? How crazy is Oracle? They provided one of the
best browsers on the planet for Solaris and Oracle did what? Ask for
money? IMO the manager responsible at Oracle should be fired.

The Opera legal folks is looking into whether Oracle's emails can be
published or not.

Dave
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-help mailing list
opensolaris-help@opensolaris.org

Reply via email to