On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Thomas Shikami <thomas.shik...@online.de> wrote: > Ryan McDougall schrieb: >> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:31 PM, Soft Linden <s...@lindenlab.com> wrote: >> >>> If you see any wording that's ambiguous about that, let us know. >>> >> >> Section 3.b.iii says that Third-party viewers must comply with the GPL >> license. >> >> What if the view is not licensed under the GPL at all -- say Apache 2.0? >> >> Cheers,
> It says, that Third-Party Viewers deriving from LL's GPLed viewer source > must comply with the GPL license. That doesn't apply to libomv based > viewers or pygop based ones or smalltalk or a complete reimplementation > of it. Actually it doesn't. "By “Third-Party Viewer,” we mean any third-party software client on any device that logs into our servers that support Second Life. Third-Party Viewers include software for viewing Second Life, any chat clients, utilities, bots, and proxies as well as applications that may not be listed in our Viewer Directory." Cheers, _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
