This is a bad idea, as the TPV violators would merely migrate to a non-blacklisted viewer.
On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 12:01 +0200, Henri Beauchamp wrote: > On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:10:33 +0000, Opensource Obscure wrote: > > > On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:56:58 +0200, Henri Beauchamp <sl...@free.fr> wrote: > > > > > Instead of a white list for which Linden Lab actually guarantees > > > nothing and to which some developers won't be able to register anyway > > > because of privacy and local Law concerns, why not making a black > > > list ? > > > > > > The black list would contain the viewer names of right out illegal > > > viewers or not yet TPV-policy compliant viewers > > > > this doesn't looks like a practical solution to me, as nobody > > could ever mantain such a list up-to-date. > > Of course yes... What kind of list do you thing Linden Lab will maintain > to block access to SL after the 30th ?... It's in fact just about making > their black list public. > > Henri. > _______________________________________________ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
