-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Is the internal browser considered the viewer itself or can it have it's own identifier? And is the user agent string of the internal browser *the* unique viewer identifier mentioned in the TPVp? Are we gonna have to hire a lawyer to get these questions answered?
On 4/5/2010 20:41, Boroondas Gupte wrote: > On 05/04/2010 10:57 PM, Ricky wrote: >> [...] we could easily add some functions into our various viewers to change >> the string into >> whatever we choose it to be. Again, just like browser useragents. >> > Would that be allowed under TPVp section 2. > <http://secondlife.com/corporate/tpv.php#priv2>c.ii? > > "You must not spoof the viewer identifier or the identity of a > Third-Party Viewer connecting to Second Life. Each version of a > Third-Party Viewer must have a unique viewer identifier and must not > use the same viewer identifier as a Linden Lab viewer or another > Third-Party Viewer." > > Boroondas > > > > _______________________________________________ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEAREKAAYFAkvgslkACgkQ8ZFfSrFHsmWX1QCcDVH2V6fdAWj+cGFXhxCvqOSx 8c0An2/dWHyCSSGH/s/ouq5FtSueM6dq =6mbF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
