Thanks Robin, you are a very kind soul. Socksifying SL Voice is much needed for behind the firewall access. R On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Robin Cornelius <robin.cornel...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Neil Canham <n...@knowsense.co.uk> > wrote: > > I hope that this is the right place to ask - I'm very interested in > trying > > the SOCKS5 support in SnowGlobe to connect to both SL and also my own > > OpenSim instances from inside corporate firewalls, and to allow > prospective > > clients to do the same. I have two questions: > > Does SLVoice traffic get 'socksified'? > > If the organisation doesn't have a Socks server, can I run a Socks server > > such as antinat outside the firewall (eg - on the OpenSim server box > itself) > > and tell SnowGlobe to route traffic through an acceptable firewall > opening > > port such as 80 or 443? > > Not currently no, the SLVoice is a seperate process and is not subject > to the socks wrappers within the viewer. Although i see no reason why > you could not" socksified" that executable with a socks wrapper > program for the time being. I think this deservesis worth a jira > feature request, as SG 1.4 supports socks and SG2.0 will once i pull > my finger out, SLVoice also supporting it is a valid requirment > > Give me the SLVoice code and i will do it. > > Robin > _______________________________________________ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting > privileges > -- 'Consider how the lilies grow. They do not labor or spin.' Rameshsharma Ramloll PhD Research Associate Professor Idaho State University, PocatelloTel: 208-282-5333 More info at http://tr.im/RRamloll
_______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
