-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/71/#review120
-----------------------------------------------------------


What about /Me, /ME or /me followed by another punctuation? Ie, "/me?", "/me!", 
etc...
Just asking because these comparisions with just "/me " and "/me'" seem very 
limited,
almost weird. More logical would be to not check anything at ALL - and either 
expand
things, or not. What happens if you just set a flag saying "whatever is in this
string, don't expand /me, /who, /whois, /kick etc" without at that point 
checking
for one specific case (missing possibly many other variations).


- Aleric


On Jan. 5, 2011, 6:14 p.m., Jonathan Yap wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/71/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 5, 2011, 6:14 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Viewer.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> The "/me" in the lsl code below would be displayed rather than being 
> translated to a name:
> llInstantMessage(llGetOwner(),"/me Hello, Avatar!");
> 
> 
> This addresses bug STORM-829.
>     http://jira.secondlife.com/browse/STORM-829
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   indra/newview/llviewermessage.cpp 845cab866155 
> 
> Diff: http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/71/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jonathan
> 
>

_______________________________________________
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges

Reply via email to