I'm afraid that VWR-24366 won't reduce link times significantly.
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 11:49 PM, Boroondas Gupte <slli...@boroon.dasgupta.ch> wrote: > On 01/14/2011 06:04 PM, Jonathan Welch wrote: > > I just did a quick study on link times for various viewers on my 2Gb XP > system > > Viewer 1st link 2nd link > CV 1.22 0:53 0:24 > SG 1.5 3:30 2:07 > V2.5 6:18 6:01 > > The long time for 2.5 be due to VWR-24366. Dunno why linking Cool Viewer > (that's what "CV" stands for, isn't it?) is so much quicker than SG 1.5, > though. > > Good news: A fix is being reviewed at > https://codereview.secondlife.com/r/95/ > > Cheers, > Boroondas > > _______________________________________________ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting > privileges > _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
