Unless it can be made available cross platform I don't see a reason to favor one over another. Personally I use Eclipse and LSLPlus and the internal editor for debug tweaks or quick hacks.
Maybe an alongside download or a link on the dev page. But I wouldn't think bundling it with the viewer makes sense unless the code is donated to the project and made to work cross platform. That is, it becomes the standard LSL editor for everyone. Mike On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 15:23 -0400, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) wrote: > On 2011-04-21 14:08, Brandon Husbands wrote: > > Hey all i own the rights to the source for the LSLEditor. > > It is publicly GPL but i can license it to ll under any terms they want. > > > > Since the external editor feature is ebing added it would be a good > > idea to deploy that with it. > > whatcha think? > > Your timing is amazing... I'd been meaning to talk to you about that... > > I confess to not having tried it yet - what say you, Community ? > > Without making any commitments about what will happen - should we make > it available as an optional component? > _______________________________________________ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
