-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/474/
-----------------------------------------------------------

(Updated Oct. 4, 2011, 8:11 p.m.)


Review request for Viewer and Richard Nelson.


Changes
-------

I've also considered hijacking an actual widget's rect but was not aware i 
could just use "view", that simplifies things!
Just tested this new diff, seems to work and even seems to follow.


Summary
-------

Update: would appreciate a LL yes or no to this, as it's one of the issues 
that's holding back STORM-64.


Texture picker's preview box was never a real widget. It had no XUI presence so 
the XUI designers had no control over it.
Also, it's height depended on the it's parent floater's min size which meant 
that increasing the min size distorted the preview box,
which must be at a 1:1 ratio.

I have modified the code in a way that
a) makes the preview box no longer reliant on any of the floater's own 
parameters.
b) gives the XUI designers three parameters that affect the preview box 
specifically: left, top, and size.
(size is both the size from left to right, and from top to bottom, keeping it 
locked to 1:1)

The changes are only noticeable to coders and xui designers, not the users.
note: It is still not a real widget and it still lacks a follow, layout, delta 
and any other widget specific abilities.


Diffs (updated)
-----

  indra/newview/lltexturectrl.cpp d36e49ee2651 
  indra/newview/skins/default/xui/en/floater_texture_ctrl.xml d36e49ee2651 

Diff: http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/474/diff


Testing
-------

The box seems to behave exactly as it did before.
Changing the indicated left, top, and size values in the appropriate xml file 
does affect the relevant properties. 


Thanks,

Vaalith

_______________________________________________
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges

Reply via email to