-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/536/
-----------------------------------------------------------

Review request for Viewer.


Description
-------

With avatar A: check on Preferences->Privacy->Only friends and groups can call 
or IM me

Get together with:
Avatar B (not a friend of A)
Avatar C (a friend of A)

Using avatar B establish an ad-hoc chat with A and C and write a message

Observed result: Avatar A and C receive the message
Expected result: Only avatar C receives the message


This addresses bug STORM-1795.
    http://jira.secondlife.com/browse/STORM-1795


Diffs
-----

  doc/contributions.txt 4982ab91ef6a 
  indra/newview/llimview.cpp 4982ab91ef6a 

Diff: http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/536/diff/diff


Testing
-------

Created a 3-way ad-hoc session per Description.  Avatar C does not receive the 
message, but does get an ad-hoc session icon, even when B initiates the ad-hoc 
session.  I think this is correct behavior because C may change their 
preferences to allow messages from everyone.  You do not want to reject the 
session (that was handled by a different jira recently for blocked residents), 
only suppress messages.


Thanks,

Jonathan Yap

_______________________________________________
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges

Reply via email to