In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
>>
>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>> > Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
>> >> 3. Example URL: http://www.openssl.org/source/cvs/Configure.diff?r1=1.7&r2=1.8
>> >> You can look at the unified diff between two revisions.
>>
>> > I notice this has the same problem as the CVS mail notification (i.e.
>> > diffs are against the wrong version where branches are involved).
>>
>> Can you give me an URL where it occurs? I'm confused because everywhere the
>> program explicitly uses two revisions and also handles both to CVS. So either
>> it's a different bug I overlooked it in the source. How can I reproduce the
>> bug you noticed, Ben?
> For example:
> http://www.openssl.org/source/cvs/Configure?hideattic=1&sortbydate=0
> refers to:
>
>http://www.openssl.org/source/cvs/Configure.diff?r1=1.1&r2=1.2&hideattic=1&sortbydate=0
> which should be (I assume):
>
>http://www.openssl.org/source/cvs/Configure.diff?r1=1.1.1.3&r2=1.2&hideattic=1&sortbydate=0
Oh, correct. That's exactly the same bug, yes. It's now fixed, too.
Seems every author forgot that the vendor branch (1.1.1) is the
only branch in CVS which is "magic". Thanks for the hint, Ben.
Ralf S. Engelschall
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.engelschall.com
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
