Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
>
> ulf> Another difference between 0.8.1 and 0.9.x is that
> ulf> RSA_padding_add_none in 0.9.x prepends a null byte first.
> ulf>
> ulf> If you want that, the code would look like this:
>
> I'd vote for having RSA_NO_PADDING mean what it says...
>
Yes so would I. A literal "no padding" would be useful for debugging and
demonstrartion purposes as well.
Also if you want zero padding you can build it on top of "true no
padding". If however you have zero padding and want "true no padding"
you can't do it using zero padding.
Steve.
--
Dr Stephen N. Henson. UK based freelance Cryptographic Consultant.
For info see homepage at http://www.drh-consultancy.demon.co.uk/
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NOTE NEW (13/12/98) PGP key: via homepage.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
